HiPer Strut — removing the disadvantages of FWD?

Good news that the Cadillac XTS has made it through the next gate and been approved for production in 2011 as a 2012 model.  Perhaps it will also benefit from this innovative suspension approach implemented on the Buick Lacrosse: Hiper Strut Suspension, which removes the disadvantages of Front Wheel Drive (FWD) of torque steer, cornering ability, and road feel while maintaining the efficiency advantages.  The XTS is expected to arrive with All-wheel drive either standard or as an option, along with a plug-in hybrid power plant.

HiPer Strut vs. MacPherson-Strut

Buick Lacrosse’s Innovative Hiper Strut Suspension Delivers Improved Ride And Handling

DETROIT – The 2010 Buick LaCrosse CXS incorporates North America’s first use of a unique front suspension design called HiPer Strut. It is a premium, technologically advanced suspension design that improves ride and handling characteristics in four significant ways:

  • Reduces torque steer
  • Improves vehicle sensitivity to tire irregularities and wheel imbalance
  • Provides more linear and communicative steering through improved camber control
  • Improves impact isolation on bumps and rough surfaces.

Derived from “High Performance Strut,” the LaCrosse CXS’ HiPer Strut suspension is partnered with conventional dampers when used with the standard 18-inch wheels and an advanced electronically controlled damping system with the available 19-inch wheels.

“HiPer Strut helps reduce torque steer and maintain negative camber during cornering,” said Jim Federico, chief engineer for Buick LaCrosse. “That improves ultimate grip levels in dry and wet conditions, as well as improves the direct feel of the road, while isolating undesirable feedback. Behind the wheel the driver experiences reduced torque steer, improved grip and increased cornering power, along with crisper handling, steering precision and feedback.”

HiPer Strut Front Suspension Exploded View

HiPer Strut is based on the MacPherson strut front suspension design and features dual-path top mountings that separate the transfer of spring and damper loads to the body structure. A combined steering knuckle/strut carrier is unique to the design. The lower control arms are attached to a rigid sub-frame that is bolted to the body structure with four isolators that reduce the transmission of noise and vibrations to the interior.

The design is also an enabler for a limited-slip differential, for even greater traction, and supports better ride quality with larger-diameter wheels – including LaCrosse CXS’ available 19-inch wheels.

“Perhaps the most significant attribute of HiPer Strut’s effectiveness is what you don’t feel,” said Federico. “You don’t feel torque steer; you don’t feel tugging or vibrations through the steering wheel; you don’t feel sharp reactions to bumps and pot holes. You simply experience a smoother, more controlled and more linear driving experience.”

The foundation

The LaCrosse’s stiff body structure is the foundation for more precise suspension tuning and the CXS’ HiPer Strut design. It is constructed with ultra high-strength steel strategically placed to enhance strength, as well as crash protection. LaCrosse CX and CXL models use a conventional MacPherson strut front suspension.

At the rear suspension, the CX, CXL and the CXS model with 18-inch wheels feature a four-link design that is mounted to the body at four points. CXS with optional 19-inch wheels and Touring Package feature a more sophisticated H-arm design that uses the same attachment points as the four-link system but with the cross member attached via isolated mounts. The lower H-arm replaces the basic trailing link, delivering a greater ride quality and lower noise.

The Touring Package also includes real-time damping and Sport Mode Selectivity, which uses four electronically controlled dampers to constantly “read” the road and make adjustments within milliseconds.

Vehicle control

Along with HiPer Strut suspension in the CXS, all LaCrosse models employ a variety of state-of-the-art systems that enable exceptional vehicle control through the steering system, brakes and more. GM’s StabiliTrak electronic stability control system is standard on all models. Additional highlights include:

  • Variable effort power steering that delivers greater assistance at low speeds, such as parking maneuvers, and reduced effort at higher speeds for a greater feeling of control. The steering system has a quick, 15.2:1 ratio, requiring only 2.75 turns lock to lock.
  • Four-wheel disc brakes with four-channel ABS, including large, 12.6-inch-wide (321 mm) front discs and 12.4-inch-wide (315 mm) solid rear discs. Lightweight, aluminum-body calipers are used at each corner.
  • Electronic Brake force Distribution that ensures optimum braking force is applied simultaneously at both axles, for maximum stability under heavy braking; and a Brake Assist System that senses the severity of a braking situation and applies additional braking pressure when needed.

Re: Cadillac killed the Electric Car (in 1912 with the electric starter)

The National Post has an interesting article Cadillac killed the electric car explaining a popular theory that the electric car originally lost out to its gasoline competitor once Cadillac developed the electric starter.  Although I like the logic of this also, by 1912 when Cadillac created the electric starter I believe that the gas powered car had already become dominant.  The electric starter was important to the continued development and enjoyment of gasoline powered cars by everyone (and SAFER!).

Charles Kettering, GM Engineer, with the first electric starter

Early cars were steam powered, or battery powered, or electric, or gas powered.  It was an open market, full of innovators and experimentation.  The reason the current conventions for the automobile developed was natural selection — survival of the fittest.  As each innovation or approach came to market, the public selected and bought the ones that were the most useful, and features of those models were copied or emulated by competitors.  Just over 100 years later we have today’s somewhat homogeneous automobiles.

If we all drove electric cars and someone suddenly developed a gasoline car today it would be viewed as a masterpiece.  The internal combustion engine gives the greatest independence, the quickest recharge, and the lightest, most efficient package of any of the technologies we know today.  The major drawbacks are emissions, which we have largely solved in modern automobiles via the catalytic converter, and the use of non-renewable fossil fuels.  Current gasoline is often E10, or 10% Ethanol; and many flex-fuel cars can run on E85, or 85% ethanol / 15% gasoline.  It is fair then to say that we can run many of today’s internal combustion engines on renewable fuels, and continue to eliminate non-renewable fossil fuels.

The reason I am so excited about extended range electric vehicles (EREV)  like the Chevrolet Volt or the Cadillac Converj Concept is that they give options.  Every vehicle can be characterized by stored energy (in the form of gasoline for conventional cars), and time of refueling (visiting a gas station, or plugging in to house current for an extended range electric vehicle).  What the EREVs give us is more options.  In my daily commute I may be able to charge at home, never need to use the gas mode, and seldom need to refuel at a gas station.  That convenience is important to me.  I am unlikely to be able to generate more gasoline at home.  There are however ways to generate electricity safely at home (solar).  Even drawing off the grid however just the convenience of a car that automatically refuels itself in my garage is an improvement.

Plug-in hybrids like the Cadillac XTS Concept have a different mix of attributes along that same range.  How much battery should a hybrid carry?  Enough to run the automobile for 10 miles or 20 miles or 40 miles?  The trade off is in weight for the battery, and oddly enough in time of recharge.  If I only commute 10 miles a day, I don’t need a 40 mile battery.  GM’s two-mode Hybrids today such as in the Escalade Hybrid tend to be able to travel in electric-only mode only at slow speeds and for only a very short range.  The plug-in hybrids (designed to plug in to wall current and recharge overnight) will have an extended battery reserve, and an extended range.  In question is how far that extended range should be.  The first full EREVs will have a 40 mile range and so a LOT of battery power and weight.  I am hopeful the plug in hybrids will have a 20 mile range, which would give me a lot of options in my commute.

This is a terrific time for the automobile.  We have higher performance vehicles than ever before, cleaner vehicles than ever before, and safer vehicles than ever before.  The new vehicles are promising to be even better than the ones we drive today.  I am very optimistic that Cadillac is bringing automobiles to market that will continue to provide enjoyment for automobile lovers.

Re: GM Saving $10.7 Billion Means Cash for Trucks, 2010 Profit Goal

Businessweek has a nice opinion piece about GM’s plans: GM Saving $10.7 Billion Means Cash for Trucks, 2010 Profit Goal – BusinessWeek.

Overall theme?  GM has cut the budget and is spending the money on improved products (good).

I found this opinion a good sign going forward but very sad looking back:

GM has come to the realization that customers are more perceptive than the old GM used to think,” said Eric Noble, president of CarLab, an Orange, California-based automotive consultant that specializes in product planning. “The only way to win is to gain an advantage in product quality.”

Here are the details of interest to me:

  • Truck redesign to include more efficient engines and lighter materials (Including Cadillac Escalade)
  • Cadillac XTS planned for production, perhaps to be in showrooms by 2013
  • Cadillac XTS will probably include a plug-in hybrid

All of this seems like good news that GM and Cadillac are on the right path — hopefully 2010 will be a shining year for execution — good production, good sales — that will lay the ground work for continued development and future products that we can all enjoy.

Cadillac still needs to solve the equation of how to sell their current sedans.  It is terrific that the SRX is such a hit, but it puts in even greater contrast the sales performance of the sedans.  Yes, the CTS Coupe will sell well when it arrives this summer.  BUT they need to get the DTS and CTS sales moving or it will be a long year.