2009 Cadillac CTS-V Comparison Tests – Car and Driver

Car & Driver tested a Cadillac CTS-V vs a Jaguar XFR vs a Mercedes E63; they pick the Mercedes 1st, the Cadillac 2nd, and the Jaguar 3rd:

All other things being equal, if the CTS-V had been equipped with an [available] automatic transmission like the two other cars here it might have tied the Benz in overall points. How, you ask? A six-speed automatic V we tested in April for CARand DRIVER.com managed the quarter-mile in 12.2 seconds, 0.4 second quicker than both the manual in this comparo and the one from our November 2008 road test. The difference would have tipped the quarter-mile-acceleration score in the Caddy’s favor.

Read more: 2009 Cadillac CTS-V Comparison Tests – Car and Driver.

This probably is the best summary:

Even with the muted soundtrack, our usually home-team-loyal German correspondent quickly deemed the Cadillac to be the sportiest-feeling car of our trio and one that, at $67,345, undercuts the test’s second-priciest Jaguar by more than $12,500. It will cost you about $8000 more than the Jag to start looking at the Mercedes…

Despite the disparate window stickers, everything else—horsepower, weight, terrible fuel economy, even tire width—is nearly identical in this group. Even the acceleration to 100 mph ended up in a three-way tie.

The three cars are very close in mission, performance, and luxury.  The Cadillac manages to achieve it all for $12K – 20K less cash.

BMW delays U.S. launch of 2011 X3

Interesting reason BMW is delaying the launch of their next X3 SUV:

BMW delays U.S. launch of 2011 X3.

The delay will also allow BMW to launch the X3 with several engine options. The X3 was originally scheduled to launch with just one engine offering – a gasoline-powered inline-six – but the compact ‘ute could now launch with up to four engine packages. A diesel engine will be part of the mix, although BMW has yet to decide if the X3’s oil burner will be a four or six-cylinder engine.

I would  like to see Cadillac offer more engine options.  Lansing Grand River where the CTS family is made is very flexible.   Why can’t we go back to the days of just picking an LS3 engine instead of the LLT engine?  Not that the LLT DI DOHC VVT V6 isn’t a sweet engine, but some people want the V8 without the price tag of the V.  It wouldn’t threaten the CTS-V package, which is brakes and suspension and that terrific LSA engine, for those that want the full supercar experience (and can afford it).

Lexus and Acura brought in the limited choices, no real options approach to options.  Cadillac should use their flexible factories and modern ordering systems to get back to making cars the way the Cadillac buyers want them.

Bob Lutz Says Cadillac CTS-V Sport Wagon is Definitely Coming – Car and Driver Blog

Bob Lutz Says Cadillac CTS-V Sport Wagon is Definitely Coming – Car and Driver Blog.

GM’s vice chairman Bob Lutz has confirmed that the 556-hp Cadillac CTS-V wagon will indeed become a production reality. Lutz dropped the W-bomb during a recent one-on-one interview while discussing how to prime the market for cool cargo haulers—like a possible Buick Regal wagon—especially among the over-35 set that grew up traumatized by wood-paneled Grand Marquis and Chrysler K-car wagon-trocities. Then Lutz said, “You know what’s really going to get you guys [on board with wagons] is the CTS-V wagon.”

This is terrific news, and something I think a lot of people see as a “no brainer”!  The Sport Wagon is around 200 lbs heavier than a CTS Sedan, but the Supercharged LSA engine has plenty of horses to handle that.  This is  great way to extend Cadillac sales — put together products that performance luxury enthusiasts are excited about.

Good decision.