Cadillac ATS Export Model 2.5L 4-cyl?

Is this the base engine for the export variant of the upcoming Cadillac ATS? (ATS name not final)

4 Cylinder Ecotec LCV Engine

 

GM Powertrain has updated the excellent 2.4L Ecotec 4 to a new 2.5L Ecotec 4 cylinder.  This engine family comes in a variety of tunes to fit different applications, but generally horsepower is up from 177 hp to 190 hp, while fuel economy may be up as well with this more efficient engine.  The Ecotec family has the smaller displacement 2L turbo models, and the larger displacement now 2.5L normally aspirated models.

Will this be the export engine for the upcoming Cadillac ATS?  Here in the USA a 190 hp engine would not sell well, but in Europe higher relative fuel prices may make a 190 hp ATS an attractive package — a good mix of performance versus fuel economy.  I hope we will also see a small turbo diesel, but time will tell.

The overall US engine range is likely to include a 3.6L flexfuel V6 engine making 300+ hp, a twin turbo 3.6L V6 making 400+ hp, and eventually a hybrid variant.  It may also include a 2L turbo 4 making 280hp, although the case for doing both a turbo 4 and a normally aspirated 6 seems weak.  In fact, I would be tempted to make the turbo 4 the standard engine, and the turbo 6 the ‘V’ engine.  I would still prefer to see a normally aspirated V8 in the mix, but an all-turbo lineup has a nice appeal.

Press clip on the new Ecotec engine:

MILFORD, Mich. – Chevrolet today revealed details of the all-new Ecotec 2.5L four-cylinder engine. More efficient, refined and powerful than its predecessor, the new power plant will be the standard engine in the 2013 Malibu.

The 2.5L is expected to deliver an estimated 190 horsepower (140 kW) and 180 lb.-ft. of torque (250 Nm) – about 12 percent more horsepower and 16 percent more torque than the current Ecotec 2.4L, while offering estimated highway fuel economy of more than 30 mpg (final fuel economy numbers are pending).

The new 2.5L will be available next summer, marking the debut of the all-new Ecotec engine family. Increased efficiency was the top development priority, achieved in part through lower engine friction. It was reduced by an average of 16 percent across the entire speed range, using new technologies such as a variable-displacement oil pump and an actively controlled thermostat. GM proprietary computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis techniques were used to develop an all-new combustion system with a higher compression ratio, which also helped boost efficiency.

The new combustion system features improved knock resistance and higher-flowing intake and exhaust ports in the cylinder head, which help increase efficiency, power and torque. The new Ecotec also has increased-authority cam phasing to minimize any compromise between efficiency, performance, emissions and driveability. Like the current generation of technically advanced Ecotec engines, the new 2.5L also features a high-pressure, direct-injection fuel system, dual overhead camshafts with continuously variable valve timing, electronic throttle control and pistons with jet-spray oil cooling.

It is also expected to be one of the quietest and most refined engines in the segment.

“The noise intensity is 40 percent less than our 2.4L direct-injected engine, which was named one of Ward’s 10 Best Engines,” said Mike Anderson, global chief engineer. “Engineers also tuned the 2.5L to deliver more of its torque at lower rpm, giving the Malibu a stronger feel at launch and during on-demand maneuvers, such as passing or accelerating on a freeway entrance ramp.”

Several new features give the 2.5L its segment-challenging refinement:

  • Balance shafts relocated from the block to a module with an integrated oil pump in the oil pan to reduce noise and vibration
  • A stiffer and stronger forged steel crankshaft that enables quieter and smoother engine operation at high rpm
  • Inverted-tooth chains for the camshaft and balance shaft drives for quieter operation
  • A unique, two-piece oil pan design, with an aluminum upper section to provide structural support and a stamped steel lower section to dampen overall noise
  • A cast aluminum bedplate with cast iron bearing cap inserts to help increase dynamic stiffness and reduce noise and vibration
  • Key sound attenuation enhancements such as a structural front engine cover, structural cam cover and lightweight composite acoustic intake manifold cover.

The new Malibu will be sold in nearly 100 countries on six continents. It is available in LS, LT, ECO and LTZ models in North America. Malibu will be built in multiple locations around the globe, including the Fairfax, Kan., and Detroit-Hamtramck assembly plants in the United States. Pricing will be announced later this year.

Cadillac Twin-Turbo V6

Now that Cadillac has shown the twin-turbo V6 in the Cadillac Ciel Concept, what do we know about this engine?

GM used a twin-turbo V6 in a SEMA concept in 2010.  It had the same 425 hp that the Ciel claims.  That engine was a direct injected 3.6L V6 with twin turbos.  Now, the Ciel Concept is also a hybrid, but let’s focus on the gas side for now.

Turbonetics T-3

The turbochargers used for the SEMA Camaro were Turbonetics T-3 units.  A custom air-to-air intercooler was used to reduce the temperature of the air on the way to the engine.  The boost was set at 7 PSI.

The T-3 is actually one of the smallest turbo units that Turbonetics offers.  A single T-3 is designed for engines under 2 liters, so a pair seem good for a 3.6L engine.  I know there is always the urge to ‘go big or go home’, but for a turbo unit for street use the smaller the turbo the more responsive the boost.

The T-3 turbo is efficient for boost up to 22 PSI, so lots of runway there.

It would be a hard call for me to put a TT3.6L V6 into an upcoming Cadillac instead of an LS3 V8 or new 5th gen V8 once they arrive.  The V8 would have more HP/torque and probably cost a lot less, take less labor to install, etc.  It would also likely have similar MPG.

However, if the TT-V6 gets a few more MPG, and perhaps as importantly gives the impression to Buyers of being more efficient, it may be a better sale.    People want performance and efficiency, and they believe that smaller engines are always more efficient.  I think it depends on a lot of factors, including engine loading and overall packaging, but I recognize the advantage of selling the sizzle, not the steak.  A smaller, more efficient engine with twin turbos brings a lot of sizzle.

Would you rather have a twin-turbo DI V6 in your next Cadillac or an LSx V8, everything else equal?

If the Cadillac ATS can’t be called ATS what would you name her?

Cadillac has consistently said that the upcoming smaller-than-a-CTS 3-series competitor may not be named ATS.  Everyone has been referring to it as the code-name ATS, which has been working, but it turns out that the name ATS may not be available.  So what should Cadillac name the new model?

ATS didn’t make perfect sense anyway, since the new car will not really be an “A” size micro sub-compact, but rather an economy size touring model.

Among Cadillac names, Lasalle was the ‘smaller’ Cadillac.  Lasalle actually was a companion marque, as opposed to a model.  Earlier, Cadillac almost used Lasalle as the name for the Seville when it came as a separate model, but settled on Seville as more fitting.  With 3-letter nomenclature that would make the nee-ATS an LTS (Lasalle Touring Sedan)?  I’m not a fan of the 3-letter names anyway.

My favorite name to bring back for the Cadillac ATS would be the “60 Special”.  I find that name very evocative and intriguing.    The car badges could just show “60S”.  I like the look of the “Sixty” script too though.

What do you think?  If the new Cadillac ATS can’t be called ATS what would you call her?