Water injection or methanol injection

Water injection or methanol injection is a system that injects water or a mix of water and methanol into the intake of the engine.  The fluid spray vaporizes, absorbing heat.  This removes heat from the cylinder, acting as a sort of chemical inter-cooling for supercharged or turbocharged engines.

Water injection or methanol injection - considering flow paths

STS-V Intercooler removed from Supercharger

 

In the Cadillac STS-V, air flows through the rear-mounted throttle body, into the supercharger, up through the intercooler, and down into the manifold.  The IAT2 intake air temperature sensor after the intercooler is in the base of the supercharger section shown in the photo above in the top left corner in the air flow to the manifold.

Water injection or methanol injection development

Water injection was originally developed and tested by Sir Harry Ricardo (1885-1974).  Among other projects, such as development of the octane rating, Sir Ricardo did testing and development of water injection.  His work was the basis for the German fuel MW 50, a 50/50 mix of methanol (an alcohol) and water used in the WWII German fighter  Focke-Wulf FW 190, and other Fighter aircraft.  The methanol injection enabled the FW 190 to go from 1600 hp to 2000 hp.  The P-51 also later used methanol injection.

Post-war methanol injection was sometimes installed as an automatic power reserve system (APR) for use in hot or high altitude takeoff.

Water / methanol injection in automobiles

The 1962 Oldsmobile F85 and Corvair Spyder offered water injection, as did the Saab 99 Turbo S later, after 1978.  In automobiles as in aircraft the purpose of water or a mix of water and metanol is to cut the temperature of the incoming air in supercharged or turbocharged engines.

 The science behind water injection or methanol injection

The latent heat of gasoline is 140 btu/lb.  The latent heat for water is 700 btu/lb.  This means that water will remove five times more heat when vaporizing than gasoline does.  When water injects into the air stream, the fine droplets of water allow the most water surface area for rapid vaporization.  Expansion of the water into steam also assists with cylinder pressure.  A side benefit of water injection is removal of deposits in the intake track.

Some will argue that lowering the air temperature or cylinder temperature in and of itself will not add power.  Although lower temperature, denser air is available, without tuning to allow increased timing to take advantage of the lower temperature air there will be little gain.  This argument overlooks the effective self-tuning of modern engines by removal of high incoming air temperature retard adders.  More to the point however, tuning for a water injection or methanol injection at the time of installation is best.

Water or water and methanol mix or 100% methanol?

Water injection alone provides air temperature and cylinder temperature reduction.  Injecting a mix of water and methanol provides a mix of cooling and additional high octane fuel.  Use of 100% methanol increases the fueling at the expense of some loss of cooling.

100% water is not combustible.  Up to a mix near 50/50, a water and methanol mix has limited combustibility.  100% methanol is highly combustible.   For refilling, water is most available, and a mix of water and methanol is commonly available in the form of low temperature windshield wiper fluid.  Pure methanol is a speed shop or specially sourced item.

A mix of water and methanol provides a good compromise between cooling, fueling, and safety.

Components of a water injection or methanol injection system

A water injection or methanol injection system is relatively simple.  A reservoir or tank holds the fluid, which is pumped at a high pressure to a nozzle.  The nozzle atomizes the fluid, spraying a measured amount into the intake.  The amount of spray depends on the type of nozzle and system pressure.  The system may use boost pressure or other engine indicators to trigger spray.

Methanol injection installed — Steve posted this report on his 2012 Cadillac CTS-V to youtube:

Methanol in wind shield wiper fluid

A partial list of some window wiper fluids and their content.  Look for % methanol in the range desired, water for the rest, and minimal ‘other stuff’.

Product Methanol Water Other Stuff
Peak 35 59 6
Turbo Power -40C 40-50 50-55 <1
-20F Super Tech 30 70 0
Rain-X all-season 20-35 50-90 1




HEET gas line anti-freeze appears to be 99% methanol and 1% proprietary other stuff.  Some sites suggest adding a container of HEET to a windshield wiper fluid base to reach a desired methanol %.

Water injection or methanol injection safety:

Please note the material data safety sheet when discussing methanol warns:

DANGEROUS FIRE AND EXPLSOION HAZARD WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR FLAME. METHANOL IS EXTREMELY FLAMMABLE AND FORMS EXPLOSIVE MIXTURES WITH AIR. METHANOL VAPORS MAY TRAVEL CONSIDERABLE DISTANCE TO A SOURCE OF IGNITION AND FLASH BACK

Methanol burns invisibly, is toxic if you get it on your skin, corrosive if you get it in your eyes.  When considering any activity involving even small percentages of methanol please take appropriate precautions.

Intercooler pump test 4: Jabsco 29 gpm pump

Update: IAT2 test results added

Today I performed an intercooler pump test on the Jabsco 50840 12v pump as a replacement for the Bosch OEM intercooler pump in my Cadillac STS-V.  The Cadillac STS-V uses the Bosch 00 392 022 006 pump.

My Cadillac has a 2nd heat exchanger, an S3 provided by Timmy C, and uses a 1 gallon AVS inline intercooler tank.  The goal of these tests is to improve intercooler cooling, which will enable the supercharged V8 to make more power.

Test setup with Jabsco pump in the loop

Intercooler pump test setup

To run a bucket test I put a FROM bucket at intercooler height, flowing into the pump and system, and out from the intercooler to a TO bucket.  This is similar to my previous intercooler pump test setup, for continuity.  I have added a TO bucket that is a mixing bucket which makes it very easy to measure output.

Predicted intercooler pump test flow:

Pump rated flow vs head pressure and system pressure curve

The Jabsco centrifugal pump does 29 gpm against no resistance, and the Bosch pump does 8 gpm against no resistance. In an actual system the pump curves overlaid with the system resistance curve predict where the pump will actually run in that system.

Intercooler Pump Test Results

In today’s test the Jabsco pump measured at a steady 2.25 gallons per 30 seconds, or 4.5 gpm (gallons per minute).  Previously, the Bosch OEM pump ran at 3.5 gpm, which would suggest the system pressure at that flow was 6 psid.  As flow increases, the resistance pressure in the system increases roughly at the square of the flow.  I expected the Jabsco pump to run 4.3 gpm, so the 4.5 gpm is good.  The Jabsco has 1/3.5 = 28.5% more flow than the OEM pump.

I still have more work to do to complete pump installation.  I will retest with the pump in place.  I will follow-up the intercooler pump test with IAT2 tests to see how the new higher flow impacts intercooler cooling.

Continuing to modify and fit check the Jabsco pump on the OEM bracket.

Intercooler Pump Test Update

Today I completed the pump install and conducted a test run with the new pump:

Intercooler pump test showing IAT2 over time during a 20 min drive

Click on the graph for a larger version.

What this graph shows is temperature in degrees F on the Y axis, over a 20 min drive on the X axis.  Spikes in the graph represent acceleration runs.  The red line is the OEM pump without the inline tank; the blue line is the OEM pump with the inline tank; the green line is the Jabsco pump with the inline tank.  Today it is 92F ambient; on the prior test days it was 90F ambient air temperature.

I read this test result to show that the jabsco pump’s greater flow allows the system to reach an IAT2 equilibrium temperature of 118-120F, an improvement of 7F.   The acceleration spike is a 20F increase, an improvement of 5F in addition to the lower equilibrium, so that at peak temps are 12f lower than previous hot day.

Intercooler pump test conclusion:

The Jabsco pump has a 1 gpm higher flow than the OEM Bosch pump.  This 1 gpm greater flow lowers the operating IAT2 temps by 7F

Ambient temp 92F; ambient air temp resets to 32f until the ecm can determine actual temps. Near gear change at top of 2nd gear.  Losing 1 degree of advance to IAT2 retard.

Cadillac STS-V Intercooler Flow GPM Bucket Test 3

Today I conducted a new flow test on the intercooler cooling system for my Cadillac STS-V.  Previously I ran a bucket test to determine the actual flow through the intercooler cooling system.  Since that test, the system has been modified to add an inline intercooler tank.  I plan to change the pump from the OEM Bosch pump to a Jabsco 80540-12 pump soon, so today’s test confirms the flow rate prior to the next mod.

The overall purpose of this series of tests and changes is to improve intercooler cooling, which will result in lower intake air temperatures after the supercharger, and let the engine make more power.

To run the test I place a ‘from’ bucket on a table, which has replaced my earlier box due to box degradation.  The From bucket flows into the first heat exchanger.  The To bucket is flowing out of the intercooler.  The goal of the test method is to measure the flow as if the test were not going on — to not impact the flow.  This is why the From bucket is in a raised place.

Today my Son assisted me with timing and checking the test setup.  We ran the test with the car engine on, to simulate working conditions for voltage.

Intercooler cooling flow Result:

We measured a flow of  1 & 3/4 gallon per 30 seconds, or 3.5 gallons per minute (GPM).  This is identical to the flow measured in the earlier test without the inline tank.  I conclude that the inline tank presents no more resistance to flow, or that the changes in hose routing during the tank install improved flow sufficiently to offset the resistance of the tank.