Cadillac XLR Volant Cold Air Intake Install and Test

Today I installed and tested a Volant Cold Air Intake p/n 25846150 for the Cadillac XLR.

Install

The install is pretty easy.  A screwdriver is needed for the clamps, and a bit of WD40 or similar for the hose fittings.

IMG_2646

This is the intake setup on the stock XLR.  The air comes into the middle then flows down through openings facing the middle to dual filters and back to the middle and through the MAF into the intake.  There are resonance tubes along the way to quiet the intake.

IMG_2648

So the engine has to breath through that opening just above the filter on the left, then down through the filters 90 degrees, 90 degrees back to the center, where they turn 90 degrees to get to the MAF.  Good filter area.  The twists and turns the air takes are to prevent hydrolock in a heavy rain?

IMG_2653

Stock intake vs the Volant Intake.  The Volant has cones and large tubes for flow vs the elliptical pinched approach the OEM took.

IMG_2656

Behind the MAF was this resonator tube.  This probably captures and eliminates certain intake frequencies?

IMG_2658

The XLR MAF is a switchblade style, and has a MAF screen to smooth air flow.  I left that in place, but removed the resonator setup and air now flows directly from the MAF to the throttle.

IMG_2659

This shows the Volant in position.  The hose to the right is not attached yet, but goes from the breather hose to the intake.  It took a bit of muscle and a drop of wd40 to get the hose barb properly inserted on the engine end.

IMG_2662

Close-up on hose attachment and placement.

IMG_2665

One of the two Volant cone filters up close.

IMG_2667

The blue filter matches the blue XLR.  The hood closed fine.

IMG_2668

No trouble lights.

Results?

I have been using Virtual Dyno to measure results.  These are 2nd gear pulls so they vary from a chassis dyno which would be done in the gear closest to 1:1 which for the XLR is 3 or 4.

XLR Volant First Test 236 whp 224 lbft baro corr

[click to zoom in, back to return]

This graph shows tonight’s run in Blue, and the prior run with current tune in Red.  The runs are on different days.  Today was hotter at 95F vs 88F yesterday.  What this appears to show is that the Volant added 10 whp and 3 lbft of torque.  The blue line is clearly above the red line from around 4700 RPM up.  This would mean the 320 hp LH2 now puts out about 320 + 10/.8 = 332 hp at the crank.

The intake also had an effect on the intake sound, and the exhaust sound.  The fuel trims kicked up to around 10% each, which is another indication the MAF is now getting more air in than it expected.  I will want to adjust for that in the tune or have the MAF dialed in on a dyno.

The XLR did not show any trouble lights, and the idle is smooth as always.   The calculated hp and torque were lower than expected, so that seems to suggest that these are not predictive of real-world performance?

Cadillac XLR LH2 VVT V8 Tune 3

Noting that in Tune 2 the 5500+ RPM response in baseline was better, I adjusted the PE table for Tune 3 to return to 1.176 from 5500 RPM+, (12.5:1) and kept 1.148 below that point (12.8:1).  So from start, Tune3 basically ONLY has this change from stock.

XLR Tune3 Run1 Comparison

The intake air was 6F hotter now at 88F, and I adjusted Virtual Dyno 12 lbs for 2 gals missing fuel.  The red line was from Tune2 this morning, and the blue line is from Tune3 later in the morning.  The engine coolant was now at 203F, and we are getting IAT retard where earlier we were actually getting IAT advance.

Calculated hp peak 310.7 hp at 6688 rpm, peak torque 305 at 3328 rpm.

I think we see that, assuming they are equivalent below 5500 RPM, tune3 in blue has a better trend from 5500 rpm up than tune2 in red.  The difference is however subtle.

Cadillac XLR LH2 V8 Tune 2 – slightly leaner – 2015-08-29

[Title corrected to read slightly LEANER – 12.5 to 12.8 commanded]

I am in the process of tuning my 2007 Cadillac XLR with HpTuners and Virtual Dyno.   For each test a known tune is loaded, then the car is tested for 2 runs, basically 4000 rpm to redline in 2nd gear in a consistent manner under known conditions.  The results are then analyzed on Virtual Dyno and the calculated hp/torque from the engine PCM for reference.

Today’s tune sets the AFR stoich back to 14.7 (baseline), and moved the PE to 1.148 (12.8 commanded – baseline is 12.5).  The IAT and ECT advance values were restored to OEM.  The net effect is testing 0.3 AFR points leaner than baseline.

XLR Tune 2 4 Comparison SAE unzoom

[click to zoom in, back to return]

This morning we had cool air (79F-82F), and I reset the gas tank to full so known weight.

The red run is tune1, blue is baseline, green and yellow are today’s runs.  What the results show is that today’s tune2 runs were better than tune1 but worse than baseline. The average for today’s runs 226 whp, 231 lbft compared to baseline 230/225.

Virtual Dyno corrects for the temperature variance, by using barometer and intake air temperature.  If I remove that correction and zoom in the chart a bit to emphasize differences, today’s runs and baseline are similar and Tune1 is the outlier.

XLR Tune 2 4 Comparison nonSAE

Then today’s runs are clearly better than baseline at lower RPM and equivalent at higher RPM.

Keep in mind in the Fueling the LH2 adds 0.5 AFT at 6000 RPM for piston protection, so it goes richer at that point by 0.5 commanded.

The Calculate HP absolutely jumped up and down and cheered at today’s tune:

xlr Tune2 CalcHp Torque

The highest numbers I have seen for calc Hp for the XLR LH2.  Perhaps due to the cooler air?  Peaks 318.7 hp at 6642 rpm, 311 lb ft at 4426 rpm.

XLR Tune2 Peak HP

HpTuners output at peak HP

XLR Tune 2 Peak Tq

HpTuners output at Peak Torque

I plan to keep this tune in place and test hot — here in Texas it is easy to get a chance to do that — and use the hot/cold tests on the same tune to decide how to treat the SAE Virtual Dyno Corrections.

If you have any insights or advice or things you wish I would try please reply below!