October 2009 Cadillac Sales — Strong for SUVs

The 2009 October numbers for Cadillac look challenging for cars, and very good for Cadillac SUVs.  The DTS sales were up for the month, so let’s lead with a DTS photo:

TexasJim's 2006 DTS Performance Sedan

TexasJim's 2006 DTS Performance Sedan © Bruce W. Nunnally

Here are the production numbers just for Cadillac:


October
(Calendar Year-to-Date)

January –  October
Cars 2009 2008 % Chg Volume %Chg per S/D
2009 2008 %Chg Volume
Selling Days (S/D) 28 27 28 27
CTS 2921 3997 -26.9 -29.5 31932 51476 -38
DTS 1896 1590 19.2 15 14021 27380 -48.8
STS 355 632 -43.8 -45.8 5398 13253 -59.3
XLR 49 52 -5.8 -9.1 689 1091 -36.8
Cadillac Total 5221 6271 -16.7 -19.7 52040 93200 -44.2
Trucks







Escalade 2127 1556 36.7 31.8 13118 19275 -31.9
Escalade ESV 599 533 12.4 8.4 5206 9076 -42.6
Escalade EXT 178 265 -32.8 -35.2 2015 3779 -46.7
SRX 3477 916 279.6 266 12247 13779 -11.1
Cadillac Total 6381 3270 95.1 88.2 32586 45909 -29

The good news is that the SRX sales are blooming.  Cadillac has a good hit on their hands and is playing to the right audience with this new model.  The Escalade Full-size SUV is also doing well.  This likely reflects the current moderate fuel prices, since SUV sales suffer with high fuel prices.  Overall truck sales are up 88% over the same month last year.

2010 Cadillac SRX

© GM Corp

The bad news is the CTS sales are down.  This is especially disappointing as it includes CTS Sport Wagon numbers, since the Sport Wagon is in Dealer showrooms now.  DTS sales are up 15%, which brings overall Cadillac car sales to only 20% behind last year.   The STS and XLR are both on their way out of production.

So Cadillac sold 1,050 fewer cars, and 3,111 additional trucks in Oct, 2009 compared to Oct, 2008, or a total of 2,061 more vehicles this year than last year for the month of October.  Overall that seems a good result.  If the SRX is siphoning some CTS sales that’s fine, as long as the overall sales numbers for Cadillac grow, which they have, increasing by 22% compared to last October.

Comparative BMW October sales by model: [Reuters]

Sales BMW of North America, LLC, October 2009

                           Oct.    Oct.            YTD Oct.  YTD Oct.
                            09      08    %           09       08       %

    1 Series               501   1,173  -57.3%      9,453    10,453   -9.6%
    3 Series             8,239   9,059   -9.1%     75,459    97,329  -22.5%
    Z4                     486     455    6.8%      2,792     5,464  -48.9%
    5 Series             3,043   3,958  -23.1%     32,733    39,289  -16.7%
    6 Series               152     454  -66.5%      3,207     5,627  -43.0%
    7 Series             1,209   1,096   10.3%      7,159    11,021  -35.0%
    BMW passenger cars  13,630  16,195  -15.8%    130,803   169,183  -22.7%
    ------------------  ------  ------  -----     -------   -------  -----
    X3                     182   1,294  -85.9%      5,280    15,914  -66.8%
    X5                   2,137   2,358   -9.4%     20,787    27,021  -23.1%
    X6                     494     356   38.8%      3,796     3,718    2.1%
    BMW light trucks
    (SAVs)               2,813   4,008  -29.8%     29,863    46,653  -36.0%
    ----------------     -----   -----  -----      ------    ------  -----
    BMW brand           16,443  20,203  -18.6%    160,666   215,836  -25.6%
    ---------           ------  ------  -----     -------   -------  -----
    Cooper /S Hardtop    2,309   3,539  -34.8%     24,248    31,226  -22.3%
    Cooper /S
     Convertible           465      62  650.0%      5,395     4,760   13.3%
    Cooper /S Clubman    1,402   1,671  -16.1%      9,529     9,980   -4.5%
    MINI brand           4,176   5,272  -20.8%     39,172    45,966  -14.8%
    ----------           -----   -----  -----      ------    ------  -----
    TOTAL BMW of North
     America, LLC       20,619  25,475  -19.1%    199,838   261,802  -23.7%
    ------------------  ------  ------  -----     -------   -------  -----

The SRX outsold the BMW X-CUV's 3,477 to 2,813 vehicles.
The CTS has to get numbers competitive with the 3-Series.

BMW total sales for Oct of 16,443 vehicles surpassed
Cadillac Oct sales of 11,602 vehicles.

In the United States, October was the best month of the year so far for Mercedes-Benz.
 Sales bucked the general market trend, rising by 21 percent to 18,200 units
(October 2008: 15,000).

Cadillac CTS 3L V6 vs BMW 328 3L I6


A lot of focus last week on the CTS-V Challenge with the Cadillac CTS-V racing vs the BMW M3 and M5.  That was a terrifically fun event.  But where the rubber meets the road between BMW and Cadillac is how their front line sedans and cross-overs compare, since this is where the sales are.  The CTS-V, M3, and M5 are all terrific, but none of them will sell in big numbers.

The BMW 3 Series is the 328, with a 230hp, 3L V6 starting at $34K, and the 335 with a 3L Turbo for 300hp starting at $41,675.

The Cadillac CTS comes in base model with a 270 hp 3L Direct Injected V6 starting at $36,730, and a 304hp 3.6L Direct Injected V6 starting at $44,365.

So, let’s compare the 3L CTS with the BMW 328.

You can see a side-by-side comparison by stat by an independent firm (Polk) on the Cadillac site here.

Big picture:

  • Both are sporty.
  • The Cadillac is roomier, the BMW is lighter.
  • They cost about the same, equally equipped.  Real world prices on the CTS may be somewhat less than the BMW.
  • The Cadillac has a longer warranty.
  • Cadillac quality and reliability has been higher than BMW quality and reliability in initial and 4-year surveys.

Speaking of the Engines, how do they compare?

The 3.0L direct injected DOHC V6 in the CTS is a new engine called the LF1.  It is a new, efficient member of the Premium V6 family that the other Cadillac V6, the LLT 3.6L Direct Injection engine belongs to.  The graph below shows the engine dyno for the Cadillac LF1 3L V6:

Cadillac likely could have gotten a bit more HP out of the 3L engine, but it was clearly tuned for a very flat torque curve.  That provides for ready acceleration in real-world use.

The BMW 328 makes 230 hp from an inline 6 cylinder:

Our inline six engine offers smooth power, greater acceleration and 200 lb-ft of torque at at 2750 rpms. A number of pioneering technologies make it possible. An electronically controlled water pump helps increase power output. Our patented Valvetronic system offers better fuel efficiency. And to save weight, we used a groundbreaking innovation that BMW was the first to use in a production car – an engine block made of a lightweight composite magnesium/aluminum.

BMW Engine Video

The engines appear to have a similar peak torque, although the Cadillac is 15% higher.  The Cadillac also enjoys 17% more Horsepower.

Bruce, Are you Media?

At the recent Cadillac CTS-V Challenge there was plenty of time during the day to network and visit with other attendees.  Even for an introvert like me, this was a bonus of the day, and I met several interesting people.

Normally the conversation would go “Introduction / Reason for being here? / Discussion”.   So, my side of the conversation might be

“Hi, I’m Bruce Nunnally from Caddyinfo.com”.

“Yes, we’re a Cadillac enthusiast website that provides information and discussion about Cadillacs”.

One Gentleman asked me, “So you’re Media?”

to which I haltingly replied, “Well, I don’t think of myself as Media”

Gentleman: “But you are.”

Which of course, got me to thinking about the whole Media issue.  The entire Cadillac CTS-V Challenge was a ‘new media’ event.  This was not a Motor Trend, Car & Driver, Road & Track Event.  This was Jalopnik and TTAC and Bloggers and Twitter event.  Lots of us were Tweating along the way,  and shooting photos right out to a website or right to a twitter photo service so that readers could see the event happenings close to real time.  This was a Media 2.0 Event.  TV, Speed Channel and CNN is the exception — they were the classic Media at the event.

Not only could I get info out to the web, I could also keep up with what the other participants were commenting about the event in real time.  So the Event definitely had the beginnings of augmented reality.

Media.  I don’t think I WANT to be Media.  To me Media represents a paradigm of unilateral communication.    The town cryer yelling out the news, with no participation from the crowd.   I want a dialog with my readers.  Just as I enjoyed the networking opportunity at the CTS-V Challenge event, I want to have a chat with other Cadillac enthusiasts or other car nuts just because we share a love for the automobile.  Interactivity and conversation, not publishing via whatever media and a mute audience with no means to respond.

But maybe that is Media 2.0 — commentary that invites access, discussion, and interactivity.