The great Cadillac CTS seat experiment

Hmm, one day I noted that a pair of my slacks had a scraped spot on the rear pocket.  That seemed odd.  Must have gotten up against a brick wall, or perhaps brushed against something sharp?

Uh oh — a second pair came out of the wash with a similar marking.  And a third. Hmm.  So next I began attempting to note what in my day might be causing a pre-mature death of my wardrobe.  Some of the slacks had scrapes, and some were developing full rips or tears.  This was rapidly becoming an expensive problem.

Finally found what I decided must be the culprit — over time the plastic panel along the side of the seat in my Cadillac CTS had become cracked.  The panel is not designed to be a load bearing structure, but in the process of sliding in or out of the car it can end up being one.  Mine had cracked in the middle, leaving a sharp prong pointing toward the driver’s seat.  So each time I got out of the daily driver Cadillac, there was some likelihood of snagging my slacks on the plastic.  Problem solved — sort of.

To test my theory, first I took a microfiber towel I keep in the CTS and carefully used it to form a second ‘skin’ over the plastic piece.  This had the advantage of being a quick and easy fix, but is a temporary solution at best.  It did help, but the towel would move out of place, re-exposing the pronged plastic, and it looked unsatisfactory.

Next I planned to get my dremel tool out and modify the plastic part to remove any sharp edges.  While examining it further to prepare for this step, I was able to simply snap off the ‘prong’ sharply pointed portion of the plastic.  This seemed to be a good solution for the pants problem, but still left the Cadillac looking worse than I would want.

The plastic part is possibly a replaceable item, but I suspect that it is a part of the Cadillac seat assembly.  Turning to ebay, I located a replacement seat assembly.

Now this seems overkill — one because my seats are otherwise in good condition, and two because there is nothing wrong on my passenger side.

Hold that thought — when I purchased my 2005 Cadillac CTS 3.6L new, the only options I selected were the 3.6L engine and the automatic transmission.  So my car has the ‘base’ seating package, which meant that year a power driver’s seat and a manual passenger seat.  My passenger seat ‘lean back’ lever has broken, and I have a replacement in hand.  But if I can replace the whole thing with a power passenger seat I would be a happier owner.  It has always been a point of irritation to me that ANY Cadillac would come with a manual seat; that is not what I expect of a Cadillac.

The power seat combo should bolt right in to my 2005 Cadillac CTS, plug right in to the waiting harness, and step up my seating accommodations to a) not broken b) all power and c) trouser safe.

Wish me luck that: the seats are as described, they are functional, they arrive safely, they bolt right in, and they work in my CTS.    Should be fun, and I am sure I will find out new things in the process.

Daimler AG reports Feb 2010 US Sales up 4.7%

Daimler AG, the mother company for the Mercedes Benz, reported Feb 2010 Sales up 4.7% from Feb 2009.  The really interesting thing is that MB is making the numbers selling sedans as opposed to SUVs.  Mercedes Benz (MB) sales also seems consistent — they make high content, high value cars that are focused on their market and sell well to Buyers who know what they are getting.

C-Class Sales held steady at 4,245 cars sold.  The C-Class ranges from a starting price of $33K for the C300 Sport Sedan up to $39,750 for the C350 Sport sedan.  This is similar to the range of pricing I would prefer for the CTS Sedan — start in the low $30s and maintain a $10K increase across the range.

The C-class also includes the C63 AMG for $57K, which is similar to the more expensive CTS-V at $62K.

I believe that the C-Class was the original target for the CTS, and the CTS can be translated as C-Class Touring Sedan.  By comparison the CTS sold 2,690 cars in February.

The new E-Class sales were very good at 4,043 cars sold.  The E-Class starts at $43,600 for the E350 and rises through $56,300 for the E550 to $85,750 for the E63 AMG.  This is the market in which the DTS and the STS should be competing, or that the upcoming XTS would compete.  With the ATS arriving to re-challenge the BMW 3-Series and the MB C-Series, I suppose now the CTS will move further upmarket to compete with the E-Class.

M-Class SUV sales, R-Class tall station wagon, and the traditional GLK class SUV sales were up statistically but still low for all models compared to BMW or Cadillac SUV sales.  Cadillac SRX and Escalade sales have continued to overshadow any MB SUV sales.

And here was our Feb 2010 Cadillac chart for comparison:

February (Calendar Year-to-Date)
January – February
2010 2009 % Chg Volume %Chg per S/D 2010 2009 %Chg Volume
Selling Days (S/D) 24 24
CTS 2,690 3,259 -17.5 -17.5 5,255 6,677 -21.3
DTS 611 982 -37.8 -37.8 1,229 2,344 -47.6
Escalade 1,418 1,238 14.5 14.5 2,655 2,591 2.5
Escalade ESV 552 416 32.7 32.7 948 1,088 -12.9
Escalade EXT 102 166 -38.6 -38.6 223 501 -55.5
SRX 3,542 552 541.7 541.7 6,776 1,440 370.6
STS 332 357 -7.0 -7.0 565 770 -26.6
XLR 26 68 -61.8 -61.8 62 126 -50.8
Cadillac Total 9,273 7,038 31.8 31.8 17,713 15,537 14.0

February 2010 US Sales: MB 15,385 BMW 15,100 Cadillac 9,273

BMW Feb 2010 US Sales up 16%; Market comparison to Cadillac

BMW US Sales in Feb 2010

3-Series — 6.3% growth is good in today’s market.  I would certainly be happy if CTS had growth in sales year / year.  The upcoming Cadillac ATS will have to be in this range of sales / month if it is to compete with the 3-Series.

Also note that 3-Series sales are up strongly from January 2010.  As we move further into the corporate bonus and pay raise season do BMW sales show an uptick?

5-Series — down 28.9% is worrisome.  Cadillac CTS again outsold BMW 5-Series.  A new 5-series is on the way, which may be muting sales?  Sales of the 5er are down from Jan 2010 as well.

SUV — Cadillac SRX sales in Feb of 3,465 were just below BMW SUV sales of 3,804.  More room for growth of SRX sales there.  Total Cadillac SUV sales, including Escalade, exceeded total BMW SUV sales.

Joke of the day: What does Cadillac have to do to match BMW SUV sales?  Cut Production.

Total US sales for BMW for Feb 15,100 versus Cadillac sales of 9,273 units highlights the additional runway Cadillac has for vehicle sales.  Cadillac is bringing the ATS to compete directly with the 3-Series, but it can’t get here soon enough for Sales.

Obviously the XTS to replace the fast-fading DTS would also help a great deal.

Here was the similar sheet from Jan 2010:

And here was our Feb 2010 Cadillac chart for comparison:

February (Calendar Year-to-Date)
January – February
2010 2009 % Chg Volume %Chg per S/D 2010 2009 %Chg Volume
Selling Days (S/D) 24 24
CTS 2,690 3,259 -17.5 -17.5 5,255 6,677 -21.3
DTS 611 982 -37.8 -37.8 1,229 2,344 -47.6
Escalade 1,418 1,238 14.5 14.5 2,655 2,591 2.5
Escalade ESV 552 416 32.7 32.7 948 1,088 -12.9
Escalade EXT 102 166 -38.6 -38.6 223 501 -55.5
SRX 3,542 552 541.7 541.7 6,776 1,440 370.6
STS 332 357 -7.0 -7.0 565 770 -26.6
XLR 26 68 -61.8 -61.8 62 126 -50.8
Cadillac Total 9,273 7,038 31.8 31.8 17,713 15,537 14.0