{"id":6654,"date":"2010-03-18T06:09:03","date_gmt":"2010-03-18T12:09:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/caddyinfo.com\/wordpress\/?p=6654"},"modified":"2010-03-18T06:09:03","modified_gmt":"2010-03-18T12:09:03","slug":"when-is-3l-better-than-3-6l","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.caddyinfo.com\/wordpress\/when-is-3l-better-than-3-6l\/","title":{"rendered":"When is 3L better than 3.6L?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Cadillac replaced the LY7 non-direct injected 3.6L V6 as the base engine in the CTS Family in 2010.\u00a0 The new base engine is the LF1 3.0L direct injected V6.\u00a0 How do these two engines compare?<\/p>\n<p>The LY7 V6 was used by Cadillac from 2004-2009.\u00a0 Originally it made 255 hp, but was improved to 263 hp in 2008 in this application.\u00a0 To be specific, 263 hp (196 kW) @ 6400 rpm and 253 lb-ft (342 Nm) @ 3100 rpm of torque.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/caddyinfo.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/03\/2008_36L_LY7_CTS.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-6655\" title=\"2008_36L_LY7_CTS\" src=\"http:\/\/caddyinfo.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/03\/2008_36L_LY7_CTS.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"652\" height=\"608\" srcset=\"http:\/\/www.caddyinfo.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/03\/2008_36L_LY7_CTS.jpg 652w, http:\/\/www.caddyinfo.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/03\/2008_36L_LY7_CTS-500x466.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 652px) 100vw, 652px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The LF1 V6 is a 3L variant of the direct injected 304 hp 3.6L V6 in the CTS Performance or Premium models. In the CTS family it makes 270 hp.\u00a0 To be specific, 270 hp (201 kW) @ 7000 rpm and 223 lb-ft (302 Nm) @ 5700 rpm.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/caddyinfo.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/03\/2010-30L-LF1-CTS.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-6656\" title=\"2010 30L LF1 CTS\" src=\"http:\/\/caddyinfo.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/03\/2010-30L-LF1-CTS.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"669\" height=\"629\" srcset=\"http:\/\/www.caddyinfo.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/03\/2010-30L-LF1-CTS.jpg 669w, http:\/\/www.caddyinfo.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/03\/2010-30L-LF1-CTS-500x470.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 669px) 100vw, 669px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>It is sometimes said that people buy horsepower, but they drive torque.\u00a0 The 3.6L non-DI LY7 V6 in this case makes more torque than the LF1 3L V6, and it makes it much lower in the rpm band.\u00a0 Both these engines are variable valve timing engines, so although it looks like the 3L is &#8216;tuned&#8217; for power at higher RPMs, the technology should allow for both low-end power and high-end power.<\/p>\n<p>The difference in displacement, in this case 20%, from 3L to 3.6L, allows the 3.6L to make 253 lb ft of torque at 3100 rpm where the LF1 3L appears to be making around 215 lb ft of torque.\u00a0 That is a big difference in how these two engines would feel in the CTS.\u00a0 The LF1 is making good power, but it will need to be wound up a bit to do so.<\/p>\n<p>There may be other advantages to the 3L direct injected engine over the 3.6L non-DI engine in terms of emissions.\u00a0 Direct injection\u2019s high pressure fuel delivery system allows for partially stratified operation, helping to reduce emissions up-to 25%, on cold starts \u2013 the time when most engine emissions are typically created.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Having both engines in the CTS use the same type of fuel injection may also help simplify the configuration of the vehicle &#8212; same fuel pumps for example &#8212; over producing variants with non-DI and DI engines together.<\/p>\n<p>The clear boost for the 3L LF1 engine would be to introduce a supercharged or turbocharged variant of this power plant.\u00a0 This engine family was originally developed to be well suited to work under pressure.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Cadillac replaced the LY7 non-direct injected 3.6L V6 as the base engine in the CTS Family in 2010.\u00a0 The new base engine is the LF1 3.0L direct injected V6.\u00a0 How do these two engines compare? The LY7 V6 was used &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.caddyinfo.com\/wordpress\/when-is-3l-better-than-3-6l\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":69,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[310,147,6],"tags":[869,184,71],"class_list":["post-6654","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cadillac-engines","category-cts-cadillac-models","category-site-info-news","tag-cadillac-engines","tag-lf1","tag-ly7"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.caddyinfo.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6654","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.caddyinfo.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.caddyinfo.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.caddyinfo.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/69"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.caddyinfo.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6654"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"http:\/\/www.caddyinfo.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6654\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6666,"href":"http:\/\/www.caddyinfo.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6654\/revisions\/6666"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.caddyinfo.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6654"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.caddyinfo.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6654"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.caddyinfo.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6654"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}